John Heart on How He Won Mr America At 48-Years-Old

John Heart WNBF 2016
John Heart won the Light Heavy & Overall title of INBF Mr. America in 2013 at 48 years-old. John was the oldest ever Mr America!

John Heart (@MrAHeart and Insta: @mraheart) is a renowned trainer and teacher within the fitness industry. He is also a Natural Pro Bodybuilder who has won the title of Mr. America and Natural Mr. Universe. His primary platforms used for training/teaching include in-gym, YouTube, and all forms of social media including Facebook.

John currently trains in-gym clients in Los Angeles, California and manages his online presence through MrAmericaHeart.com. He is also the official online trainer of Mike Mentzer’s Heavy Duty Training System.

John’s Athletic Achievements/Highlights:

  • 2013-present – Worldwide: Competed as WNBF Natural Professional Bodybuilder in 4 professional events, usually placing between 2nd – 6th
  • 2013 – Secaucus, New Jersey: Won the Light Heavy & Overall title of INBF Mr.
    America
  • 2012 – Secaucus, New Jersey: Won the Light Heavy class of INBF Mr. America
  • 2001 – Los Angeles, California: Won Tall class of ABA Natural Mr. Universe

In this episode we dig into the details of John’s pre-bodybuilding contest routine in tremendous detail including exercise routines, protocol, and diet.

In this episode, we also cover:

  • John’s use of electronic muscle stimulation
  • The debate around the importance of “progressive overload”
  • The evolution of John’s approach to bodybuilding over the years

Listen below:

Listen to the Corporate Warrior Podcast on iTunesListen to the Corporate Warrior Podcast on Stitcher

Would you like to hear from another High Intensity Training Bodybuilder? Check out my interview with Mike Lipowski here or stream below:

 

This episode is brought to you by the Resistance Exercise Conference – The science and application of strength training for health and human performance.

Would you like to:

  • Learn from the top strength training researchers?
  • Network and connect with other exercise professionals from all over the world?
  • Join a welcome reception on Friday night to build relationships with other strength training professionals?
  • Experience an early morning workout from an expert trainer to kick start your Saturday?
  • And get inspired, rejuvenated and focused on your strength training business?

I certainly do and that is why I am attending and interviewing all of the speakers at the event.

The resistance exercise conference will be held on the 9th and 10th of March 2018 in Minneapolis, Minnesota at The Commons Hotel.

To get 10% off your entry fee, head on over to ResistanceExerciseConference.com, click the registration button and enter corporatewarrior10 in the promo code field in PayPal.

I’m very excited about this and have wanted to attend for years. Sign up now at ResistanceExerciseConference.com, get 10% off with promo code corporatewarrior10 and I look forward to meeting you in person!Resistance Exercise Conference logoSubscribe to my emails to get a FREE HIT workout progress sheet and eBook with 6 podcast transcripts with guests like Dr. Doug McGuff, Drew Baye, and Skyler Tanner – Click here

Selected Links from the Episode

People Mentioned

  • Kamen Stranchevski

    Wow, what a great Interview! Wonder why I am the first to comment?! Either because it’s holidays or because the crowd was left speechless by Mr. Heart’s shared real life experience :))
    I was waiting for this interview since the time it was announced to be under way and it was more that wothed…as I expected and then some more!!
    My personal take away points form this interview and from that of Mark Asanovich are:
    1. RECOVERY shall always be the focus! Extensive Stimulus/Fatigue will never be the answer; If you need to go as hard as possible, Do so only if you keep the fatigue in check!
    2. “Progressive overload” may not be as important or scientifically proven necessity, BUT in real life of training, we must be cautious to recognize “muscle failure” from “discomfort” failure. Shorter TUL sets seem to be a great remedy here. This also helps with recovery/fatigue and it seems, that shorter duration sets work just fine as stimulus as well(for Mr. America and when on a diet ;))) So in effect one’s “progression” should be to try and stay within thier shortest working TUL for a given exercise by modifying difficulty of a bodyweight exercise, or by adding weight…
    3. With regards to diet – Carbs are not the Enemy! and Calories MATTER big time! (John’s take on daily protein intake did not get mentioned particularly in this one, but I STRONGLY advise anyone interested to listen to his other interviews with NorCal…you may be surprised 🙂 )
    Thank you John for sharing! Please stop by here, again for a Part two at some point in the future 🙂

  • Kamen Stranchevski

    By the way Lawrence, what is your opinion about John’s shared views? I believe you found several of John’s practices to be different than your personal ones (based on what you’ve shared so far). I am just curious 😀

    • https://corporatewarrior.co lneal87

      Thank you for your contribution Kamen :D. I agree with practically everything you say below and most of John’s views, especially regarding training. I think some of the pre-exhaust stuff might be unnecessary based on some of the literature, but John is far more experienced than I in the practice. I probably differ on diet just because I prefer 2 large meals and doing intermittent fasting. I do think the macro-nutrients matter though and fat and protein should be optimised for muscle retention and mitochondrial health, and as a result, carbs tend to be on the low side for me, since they seem the least useful ;-). I’m also highly skeptical regarding the electric muscle stimulation but John is also. Overall, John admits that much of what he does isn’t underpinned by scientific evidence, but he believes it will give him an edge or possibly subtract from his performance if he removes it. All power to him.

  • Kamen Stranchevski

    Hey Lawrence, I got so inspired by the interviews of Mr. Asanovich and John Heart, so that I decided to modify my current workout protocol, to coinside with the Mike Mentzer’s Ideal Routine principles and give it a try for some time. I had done Mike’s Ideal Routine back in the past as perscribed in his book “Heavy Duty The Mike Mentzer’s Way” with very good results. After about an year though, similarly as John Heart, I got cought up again with the typical Bro stuff and lost some precious time doing useless BS. The Ideal Routine is in essence a four way split – 1. Chest-Back, 2. Legs, 3. Shoulders-Arms, 4. Legs – Repeat. Each workout is followed by 4-8 days of rest, depending on one’s personal status. Almost each muscle group is trained with a superset of one pre-exhaust(single joint) and one compound movement, done to failure in the mid rep range 6-8, with only the legs being an exclusion – 10-15 rep range.
    At present due to my personal, experience, preference and belief there will be a few changes to this scheme:
    1. Pre-exhaust is not delivering any special results (besides special feeling in the muscles and pump), so I will almost not use it. Instead, I would do a Rest-pause at times – mainly to make sure my focus on effort was sufficient and failure was a “muscle failure”, rather than “Discomfort Failure”
    2. At this point of my training career, I see no need for direct Arms work, so there will be none included. That is another reason I’ll drop the pre-exhaust out. I need balanced lodaing from the compound movements.
    So my Training split will be rather of a “Push-Pull” style, namely:
    Week 1- Workout A:
    1. Shoulders – Machine millitary press (sometimes w dumbells);
    2. Chest – Weighted Dips;
    3. Chest – Flat bench db fly;
    4. Quads/Front leg – Leg press OR Superset of Leg extention-Weighted belt squat;
    5. Calves – Leg press ones, Bill de Simone shown style;

    Week 2 – Workout B:
    1. Back – Weighted Chin ups;
    2. Back – Rows on a low pulley OR machine w chest support;
    3. Hamstrings – Leg curl machine;
    4. Hyper extentions on an upper pulley – Dr. Mc Guff shown style;
    5. Abs – flat bench(legs on the floor) plane bench crunches with weight.

    So in effect, systemic recovery stays in check with low session volume/low frequency. Local muscle recovery stays in check as “two weeks” blocks between direct work per muscle group will be employed as suggested by Mike Mentzer. (By the way I have read analysis of Mike’s program by russian scientists, who recognized, that indeed some muscle damadge recovery processes in the muscle tissues actually do take up to 14 days to be completed!) In addition, when muscles are trained so infrequently, they do become somewhat deconditioned to the load and exercise. They are not smaller or weaker, but are deconditioned. This may not be a bad thing and can be used IMO, as everything is realtive in life. Such a training scheme may ensure, that the exercises we have selected will be “working as proper stimulus” for us longer (we will not get used to them, build skill etc.). And whatever we gain as strenght or size will be more likely due to actual body development, rather than skill and/or other temporary exercise effects.
    Because in the end there are only so many exercise selections per each muscle, that are effective, efficient and safe.
    According to my understanding the worst thing could happen, because of this change and midification of my protocol, is to slow down my progress…but I sincerely doubt it 😀
    I hope, that this post may give Ideas to others here on the blog with regards to their own trainining protocol designs 🙂

    • https://corporatewarrior.co lneal87

      Really appreciate you sharing this here Kamen. I think people will find it very useful.